More Hype because of the Romero Legacy...
Created: 02/09/08
George A. Romero's latest Dead flick "Diary of the Dead" follows a long line of other Living Dead flicks by many other directors as well as Romero himself. So, one cannot help to compare this one to all the others, yet that can only set up some good movies for disaster, therefore it is always good to judge movies by their own "stand-alone" merit as well. In this case Romero's Diary was an Average flick that really could have been made by any number of directors. Matter of fact, there are many other lesser known directors who have done much better. What this film lacked was the most basic ingredient in any horror film - FEAR! I simply was not scared. So, compared to other Zombie flicks, including his own, it was almost below average. As a stand-alone movie it had some merit hence the Average rating. A Reality/Documentary top Dead flick has been something in the written word for a long time now yet not on the big screen. Add Romero's experience and production in the genre and thats a good thing. What might actually be taking place is Romero has become more concerned with trying to send a message than make people scared. Each of his movies had a so-called message, and this one comes across almost like a Michael Moore video about instant information and reality news coverage. Instant news, just add water. Unfortunately, his messages are slowly taking the place of fear in his Dead films. And there is simply nothing like knowing that you are of the remaining few "living" humans on the planet, and that there are "undead" corpses trying to consume your flesh at every turn. Put all that and a plot-line in a blender and you should have yourself a pretty good Zombie flick. Enjoy!
2 of 2 people found this review helpful.

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.
The Death of HANDI-CAM
Created: 02/05/08
Extremely amatuer offering from the often brilliant George A Romero. Pales in comparison to earlier work. If Romero was trying to make a statement about media's desensitizing nature when put into the hands of the consumer, he failed. I HAD read all the hype about this in-production film, most of it from Romero saying how it was his best work. Oookay. Night of the Living Dead used unknown actors like Duane Jones and Judith Odea. They were believeable. The unknowns in this film are not believeable. It's supposed to be a documentary filmed by Jason Creed and friends the day the dead rose. It's supposed to feel real, but the bad dialogue and bad acting take you out of the film. Their unrealstic reactions to hazardouz situations makes you want to see them get their comeuppance. George Romero's movie dialogue is up there with another recent George's dialogue lately. George Lucas that is. Very disappointing, from the same man who brought us Dawn of the Dead 1978, Night of the Living Dead 1968, Day of the Dead 1985 and Martin.
Piece of advice, download this one, don't waste your money on the DVD or theatre.
See another film called REC (from Spain) for a more realistic depiction of an unfolding epidemic.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful.

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.
Romero's Legacy
Created: 06/06/08
I give an average rating with heavy heart. Suffice to say I'm a long time "of the Dead" fan and what I appreciate most in Romero's work is the way the characters interact and drive the story. The zombies in his works are but the setting in which we are able to appreciate his character-driven plots. Unfortunately - and admittedly what Romero was intending - throughout Diary of the Dead, we are left staring at a commentary on the new state of media and our shared responisibility in reporting (see YouTube.com if you've been asleep for the past ten years). The characters take a previously unheard-of backseat to Romero's message, "Beware what you watch for," and provide us with less than ever before.
Recently, and perhaps this is a sign of his age (or mine), Romero has failed to enlighten. I would have given this a higher rating had the entire story included two characters' interactions inside a shack while one zombie threatened from outside. Mr. Romero, take heart in the fact that most of us still look for that character-driven tale of zombies! Don't chicken out, we don't need eight characters nor eighthundred zombies! We just need you and your genius!
5 of 5 people found this review helpful.

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.
Romano changes with the times best ever made!!!
Created: 01/03/09
A lot of people in the zombie culture of film watchers like me.
Should also look how Romano has made 1 of the best zombie films ever here.
It was about society what we have become an him evolving mastering the genre better. With these days of You Tube,Face book,Myspace,Blogs, & etc...
What better way to do a film the editing is superb giving you camera angles that are great.
You truly feel like your in the film from start to finish.
Letting us know the audience we are not stupid. Even if you don't like Zombie films you will like this with the realistic sarcasm, great effects like always,
what we have become as humans. The last line of the movie says it best.
Romano is a master of the art it was never supposed to be like Land of the Dead,Dawn of the Dead, or even any of his work before.
It is meant to be what society is today, political,& culture of humans beings in this modern era of technology. Who is worse the zombies or us.
It is a masterpiece will have you glued from the time it starts all the way to the end!!!
See it Thank me later,
onemixer
1 of 2 people found this review helpful.

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.
Diary of he Dead.... not so good!
Created: 09/12/08
First off, I'm a huge fan or Romeros' films, so this is my honest opinion based on that statement. As far as story goes, it had a good idea. People are filming the " living dead " with a camcorder while the events of the film take place. A student is trying to film the event for a class project, and he becomes quite moronic by putting his life and others on the line to get the shot. Just plain stupid actions, that absolutely no one whould do. The gore is is most definately at a miniumum compared to say Land of the Dead or Dawn of the Dead. Don't waste your money, unless your a completest of Romero films, but it is by far the worst of the series. I suggest " zombie Diaries " on dvd. I think this is what Romero could have done with this film. Much better acting, gore, and more true to what people whould do if this where to happen.
I'd give Diary of the Dead a 2 out of 5, and that's pushing it!
2 of 2 people found this review helpful.

Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our
guidelines, it will be posted within 24 hours.
You cannot vote on the helpfulness of a review you wrote.
Your request cannot be processed at this time. Please try again later.