The Holy Bible with a commentary and practical
improvements : in this work are inserted the notes and collections of
John Locke, Daniel Waterland, the Right Honourable Edward Earl of
Clarendon, and other learned persons.
Dodd, William. London: Printed for R. Davis; J. Newbery; L. Davis; and C. Reymers, 1765. Vol II.
A massive early English folio Bible, with important commentary by John Locke and noted forger William Dodd, among others. An almost forgotten production of the
unhappy Dodd; it is founded on the manuscript collections of Cudworth,
Waterland, Clarendon, and others. Contains engraved
portrait of John Locke in front, as well as a woodcut on the Authorization page. Bound in well worn Emglish leather, mostly lacking from the boards but intact along the spine and on the spine itself; carrying aggressive raised bands and an intact and attractive title label. Marbled endpapers are lacking. Pages in nice shape forgiving some wear towards the front, with the first 5-7 leaves with some tears, some creasing, and the like. The text block complete ,all pages bound with a few wear points, small tears, etc. Page edges uncut. Vol II of a III volume set, covering the Book of Job through Malachi, only. Measures 18" x 11" x 2.75", a true giant! Good luck
William Dodd (clergyman)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
William Dodd at the place of execution at Tyburn
William Dodd (29 May 1729 – 27 June 1777) was an English Anglican clergyman and a man of letters. He lived extravagantly, and was nicknamed the "Macaroni Parson".
He dabbled in forgery in an effort to clear his debts, was caught,
convicted, and, despite a public campaign for a Royal pardon, became the
last person to be hanged at Tyburn for forgery.
Dodd was born in Bourne in Lincolnshire, the son of the local vicar. He attended Clare Hall in the University of Cambridge from 1745 to 1750, where he achieved academic success and graduated as a wrangler.
He then moved to London, where his spendthrift habits soon left him in
debt. He married impulsively on 15 April 1751, to Mary Perkins, daughter
of a domestic servant, leaving his finances in an even more precarious
At the urging of his concerned father, he decided to take holy orders, and was ordained a deacon in 1751 and a priest in 1753, serving as a curate in a church in West Ham, then as a preacher at St James Garlickhythe, and then at St Olave Hart Street. He became a popular and fashionable preacher, and was appointed as a chaplain in ordinary to the King in 1763. He became a prebend in Brecon, and was a tutor to Philip Stanhope, later 5th Earl of Chesterfield. He became chaplain to the King, and became a Doctor of Laws at Cambridge University in 1766. After he won £1,000 in a lottery, he became involved in schemes to build the Charlotte Chapel in Pimlico, and bought a share of the Charlotte Chapel in Bloomsbury.
Despite his profession, he continued his extravagant lifestyle, and
became known as the "maccaroni parson". In 1772, he became rector of Hockliffe, in Bedfordshire, and vicar of Chalgrove.
In 1774, in an attempt to rectify his depleted finances, he attempted to obtain the lucrative position of rector of St George's, Hanover Square. He wrote a letter to Lady Apsley, wife of the Lord Chancellor,
offering her £3,000 to secure the position. The letter was traced back
to Dodd, and he was dismissed from his existing posts. He became an
object of public ridicule, and was taunted as Dr Simony in a play by Samuel Foote in the Haymarket Theatre. He spent two years abroad, in Geneva and France, while the scandal subsided. He returned to England in 1776. In The Luck of Barry Lyndon Thackeray has his protagonist refer to meeting 'Dr Simony' in Soho and to a friendship with Foote.
Forgery and execution
In February 1777, he forged a bond for £4,200 in the name of his
former pupil, the Earl of Chesterfield, to clear his debts. A banker
accepted the bond in good faith, and lent him money on the strength of
it. Later the banker noticed a small blot in the text and had the
document re-written. When the clean copy was presented to the Earl to
sign, in order to replace the old one, the forgery was discovered. Dodd
immediately confessed, and begged time to make amends. He was, however,
imprisoned in the Wood Street Compter pending trial. He was convicted, and sentenced to death (see the full record of the trial under External References below.) Samuel Johnson
wrote several papers in his defence, and some 23,000 people signed a
37-page petition seeking a pardon. Nevertheless, Dodd was publicly
hanged at Tyburn on 27 June 1777.
He wrote several published works, including poems, a novel, and theological tracts. His most successful work was The Beauties of Shakespeare (1752). He also wrote a Commentary on the Bible (1765–1770), and composed the blank verse Thoughts in Prison while in Newgate Prison between his conviction and execution.
"It concentrates his mind wonderfully"
Dodd's sermon The Convict's Address to his unhappy Brethren
was largely written by Samuel Johnson to be used as Dodd's own. When one
of Johnson's friends doubted the authorship, Johnson, in order to
protect Dodd, made his famous remark "Depend upon it Sir, when a man
knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind
wonderfully". James Boswell gives Johnson's explanation of the
circumstances in his Life of Samuel Johnson:
Johnson disapproved of Dr. Dodd's leaving the world persuaded that The Convict's Address to his unhappy Brethren
was of his own writing. 'But, Sir, (said I,) you contributed to the
deception; for when Mr. Seward expressed a doubt to you that it was not
Dodd's own, because it had a great deal more force of mind in it than
any thing known to be his, you answered,--"Why should you think so?
Depend upon it, Sir, when a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight,
it concentrates his mind wonderfully."' JOHNSON. Sir, as Dodd got it
from me to pass as his own, while that could do him any good, there was
an IMPLIED PROMISE that I should not own it. To own it, therefore, would
have been telling a lie, with the addition of breach of promise, which
was worse than simply telling a lie to make it be believed it was
Dodd's. Besides, Sir, I did not DIRECTLY tell a lie: I left the matter
uncertain. Perhaps I thought that Seward would not believe it the less
to be mine for what I said; but I would not put it in his power to say I
had owned it.'