|Listed in category:
This item is out of stock.
Have one to sell?

Vacuum Bags for iRobot Roomba i7 i7+(7550),i3+ i1+i4+ i6+ i8+s9 s9 Plus j7+7550

Condition:
New
Out of Stock / 82 sold
Price:
US $12.99
ApproximatelyC $17.79
Shipping:
Free Standard Shipping. See detailsfor shipping
Located in: San Pablo, California, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Tue, Jun 18 and Mon, Jun 24 to 43230
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the shipping service selected, the seller's shipping history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30 days return. Seller pays for return shipping. See details- for more information about returns
Payments:
     

Shop with confidence

eBay Money Back Guarantee
Get the item you ordered or your money back. 

Seller information

Registered as a Business Seller
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:155989367435
Last updated on Jun 06, 2024 15:39:53 EDTView all revisionsView all revisions

Item specifics

Condition
New: A brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging (where packaging is ...
Brand
iRobot
Compatible Brand
For iRobot
Type
Vacuum Cleaner Bags
Number in Pack
12
Compatible Model
Universal

Item description from the seller

ChicFeet

ChicFeet

97% positive feedback
300 items sold

Detailed seller ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
4.9
Reasonable shipping cost
4.9
Shipping speed
4.9
Communication
4.9

Popular categories from this store

Seller feedback (65)

y***_- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Nice, you seem to work better than the originals as far as fit into the home base. I'm not sure about how well they collect particles.
z***1 (2078)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Fast shipper, good package, great items and good price.A+++++++
6***o (184)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Works good, fast delivery would use again.
See all feedback