 |
The router does what it's supposed to do. The console does not provide the option for HTTPS access. Ways in which console is not user-friendly: - No search feature for settings -- The only way to find a non-obvious setting is by guessing and trial and error. - Devices on the network are represented only by MAC addresses. The device names are not shown, nor is it possible to manually set the names/descriptions so that they can be easily identified in the listings/logs on the console. - When adding a device to access rules, or mapping it to a reserved IP address, the MAC address needs to be added manually. The currently connected devices are not presented to choose from for these purposes.
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: New
I have it connected to USB 2.0 port since computer does not have USB 3.0 ports . Reliably gets between 120Mbps and 150 Mbps performance in this configuration and it outperforms AC1200 A6200 Netgear adapters. Can also be used as an AP connection for other computers. Is well worth the expense. Recently upgraded a laptop to have a USB 3.0 port instead of just USB 2.0 ports and found the Archer performance increase to 200 Mbps to my ISP. LAN to LAN transfer between AC600 speed are not faster than 200 Mbps for some reason that is router related and not the adapter. The bottom line here is the Archer T2UH performs well connected to a USB 3.0 port. I will buy additional units soon. It would be better if it had a dock but plugged into USB hub I can move it to get better coverage.
Verified purchase: No
Thought I would try out the TP-link product with a friend network that needed a bridge mode router, the unit looks nice and is very easy to use. I was worried about the speed and range but both are great.
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: Pre-owned
The revision I bought is compatible with OpenWRT and LEDE. I ended up flashing LEDE on it (v2.0 with S/N starting with 215C). On the negative side, I had to flash DD-WRT first, then an old vendor firmware, then the firmware of my choice. Why create so much trouble for the rightful owner of the device? Also, major hardware changes between revisions are not helpful. I want to know what I'm buying. How can a review for a device with one chipset be relevant to a device with another chipset? Are we running out of numbers or something? To be fair, other vendors do it to. TP-LINK is just following the common practice, and missing an opportunity to rise above the crowd. The range and the speed are pretty good, certainly better compared to other routers I tried.
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: Pre-owned
All the instructions are built into its own website when you log in. From that point you can look at the default settings or change them to your liking. I changed them to the same settings as my old rental from the cable company. Not only that I have the 2.4 band I got the 5 band coverage also which has made my smart phone and pad much faster. Just take your time to read instructions before changing I bought mine used but it works perfectly. I feel somebody returned it because they couldn’t set it up properly
Verified purchase: Yes | Condition: Pre-owned
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Best Selling in Wireless Routers
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- Save on Wireless Routers
Current slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES}- You may also like
